I think that the
question about whether a zoo has no useful purpose is the one that is open for
debate. It is a topical question nowadays. Some people believe that a zoo has
an essential and cognitive purpose. However, other people believe that a zoo
has no useful purpose and people should observe wild animals in their nature.
Personally, I think that both options have their advantages. In the following
paragraphs I will analyze these points and present my own view in favor of
people who think that animals should not be kept in a zoo.
From the one side, a
zoo has many benefits for people. First of all, children can learn about
animals not only from books and TV programs but from actually watching them
alive. They can see animals, touch them and even feed them. I think it is an
amazing experience for a child. He gains more knowledge and experience from
this "communication" with an animal. Second of all, a zoo is a
perfect place for adults to see many animals that people are not able to see in
their lives.
However, from the
other side, I keep asking myself
"What kind of benefits wild animals have from a zoo?".
Unfortunately, I can not find any of them. I think that wild animals should
live in their nature environment. Moreover, I think that we should observe them
through TV programs sitting in our favorite chairs, or people who like danger should try to
observe them in the native environment. I think that animals are not toys. I
know that most zoos try to keep their animals in the environment which is close
to their native, but they can not give them as much freedom as animals want to.
To sum up, I think
that wild animals should not be kept in a zoo. Personally, I enjoy more
watching "Discovery Channel" then watching a black bear who does not
know where to hide from the scorching sun in a Texas zoo.
No comments:
Post a Comment